Numerous studies funded by various government agencies such as the National Science Foundation, Caltrans, Texas DOT, Nebraska Department of Roads, US Army Corp of Engineers, etc. have proven the effectiveness of our PileMedic® system to repair and strengthen columns.
Our structural engineers will provide designs that enhance axial, flexural and shear capacity of the column. The sealed engineering drawings and calculations will be provided to the client.
Professor Ehsani's development of PileMedic® for repair of columns started in the early 1990s where he and his associates at the University of Arizona received a research grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation to study retrofit of bridge columns with FRP. A total of 15 specimens were constructed and tested. The findings of that study were fully detailed in the following three journal articles; it is recommended that those who desire an in-depth understanding of the subject, read these articles that are available on this website:
To simulate and understand the behavior of "older" and poorly-designed bridge columns, concrete columns were constructed and tested. As shown below, each column was subjected to an axial load of 100,000 pounds. Then the top of the columns was subjected to reverse cyclic loading to simulate the earthquake motion. The graph above shows how these specimens fail. After a couple of loading cycles, the column can no longer resist the applied load; this is shown from the graph where the maximum load at the end of each cycle is less than that at the end of the previous cycle.During these tests, columns suffer significant damage at their base (where the column is connected to the footing). The photo shows the column after it has failed; it is evident that the longitudinal steel bars are buckled and are no longer straight; this would indicate that the column had become slightly shorter by the end of the test!
All columns in the study were repaired and retested. Repair consisted of removing any loose concrete and packing the void with a concrete mix. Since full compaction of concrete would be difficult to achieve under such circumstances, there would be voids within the concrete at this stage. As described later, these would be filled with an epoxy resin.
In the early 1990s since we had not developed the PipeMedic® laminates, we manufactured a somewhat similar but inferior product as shown in the figure on the left below. Unidirectional glass fabric in 6-inch wide bands were saturated with epoxy resin and wrapped several turns around a mandrel representing the shape and size of the column. Mylar sheets were used between the layers to prevent bonding of the saturated fabric to itself. The mandrel and fabric were placed in an oven and cured. Once removed, the result was the laminates that are shown in the photo below.
The laminates were wrapped around the column by brushing a layer of epoxy between the layers to create a multi-layered system. Typically four 6-inch wide bands were epoxy-bonded to the lower 2 feet of the column. Then as shown epoxy resin was injected into the deteriorated column to fill the voids in the concrete. These columns were subsequently tested. For the column described earlier, the results of the testing after repairs are shown above. The hysteretic (load vs. displacement) response of the repaired specimen is shown in green line (above). For ease of comparison, the response of the specimen before the repairs that was shown above is repeated in dashed line here. As can be seen, the repaired specimen continues to carry more load with each new cycle of loading. In fact, testing had to be stopped because we reached the maximum pull and push displacement that the testing equipment could provide (+/- 5 inches) without being able to fail this specimen! This test clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of this system for repair of damaged column -- making them much stronger than their original undamaged strength.
As a part of this study, we also tested a specimen identical to the control one. But in this case, the specimen was retrofitted with FRP bands in a similar manner and tested without any prior testing and damage. This hysteretic response is shown in red (above). Again, for comparison the response of the control specimen is shown in dashed line. It is clear that the retrofitted specimen also performs very well -- as expected. These tests and others that were a part of that NSF study and are not shown here clearly attest to the effectiveness of FRP laminates in repair of damaged columns and retrofit of undamaged columns. Our new PileMedic® laminates are significantly more efficient than the laminates used in the above study because:
PileMedic® laminates do not need to be custom made to fit a column of particular size and shape; a sheet of laminate fits columns of any shape or size. This feature not only makes construction scheduling much easier, it also allows these laminates to be used as a fast post-disaster repair system, for example in the immediate hours following an earthquake.
PileMedic® laminates are as wide as 5-ft (compared to the 6-inch wide earlier laminates) and their biaxial reinforcement provides strength in both hoop (confinement) and longitudinal direction (for bending).
The unique construction of PileMedic® laminates also allows us to perform certain repairs (for example repair of submerged piles without the need for divers) that would not be possible with the early generation of laminates we used in the 1990s.